|
[ Cancer and Prostate Archive ] [ Main Archives Page ] [ Glossary/Index ] [ FAQ ] [ Recommended Books ] [ Bulletin Board ] |
Search this site! | |
I have seen this in action. I was conducting a breath session when
my client suddenly grasped her breast. I asked if she could keep
breathing, as that we could discuss whatever happened afterwards.
She said that was fine and continued the session. After the
session, I checked in to she if she wanted to talk about what
happened. It was then that she told me her breast lump
spontaneously disappeared!!! Needless to say, we were both estatic!
Other comments?
Misty L. Trepke
http://www.searching-alternatives.com
Cancer LOVES Sugar!
Every doctor learned back in medical school all about Otto Warburg's
discovery; a discovery of humongous proportions, because way back in
the fifties Otto discovered the main biochemical cause of cancer, or
what differentiates a cancer cell from a normal, healthy cell. So
big a discovery was this, that Otto Warburg was awarded the Nobel
Prize.
Cancer has only one prime cause. It is the replacement of normal
oxygen respiration of the body's cells by an anaerobic [i.e., oxygen-
deficient]cell respiration. -Dr. Otto Warburg
But what else does Warburg's discovery tell us.
First off, it tells us that cancer metabolizes much differently than
normal cells.
Normal cells need oxygen. Cancer cells despise oxygen.
In fact,oxygen therapy is a favorite among many of the alternative
clinics we've researched.
Another thing this tells us is that cancer metabolizes through a
process of fermentation.
If you've ever made wine, you'll know that "fermentation" requires
sugar.
The metabolism of cancer is approximately 8 times greater than the
metabolism of normal cells.
Okay, so here is what we can put together knowing the above: The
body is constantly overworked trying to feed this cancer.
The cancer is constantly on the verge starvation and thus constantly
asking the body to feed it.
When the food supply is cut off, the cancer begins to starve unless
it can make the body produce sugar to feed itself.
The wasting syndrome, *cachexia*, is the body producing sugar from
proteins (you heard it right, not from carbohydrates or fats,
but from proteins) in a process called glycogenesis.
This sugar feeds the cancer. The body finally dies of starvation,
trying to feed the cancer.
Now, knowing that one's cancer needs sugar, does it make sense to
feed it sugar? Does it make sense to have a high protein diet?
The reason Food Therapies even exist today (beyond the fact that
they work) is because someone once saw the connection between sugar
and cancer.
********************
There are many food therapies, but not a single one allows many
foods high in proteins or carbohydrates and not a single one allows
sugars, BECAUSE SUGAR FEEDS CANCER.
Why doesn't your physician tell you this? Hard to tell.
Maybe your doctor feels it is his job to cure your cancer, not yours.
Maybe because your doctor learned about Warburg, but never put the
rest together, never placed nutrition into the equation.
Maybe because your physician didn't study nutrition.
Heck, as late as 1978, the AMA's official position (stated in courts
of law) was that nutrition had nothing to do with health or disease.****************
However, those who've paid attention to this sugar craving cancer
stuff have come up with some remarkable therapies for cancer.
Laetrile is just one.
Hydrazine Sulfate, which stops the process of glycogenesis in
greater than 50% of all patients with cachexia is another.
Today, at the University of Minnesota, they are experimenting with a
chemotherapy delivered in a "smartbomb."
Here's the scoop: the drug is wrapped in a coating that stays intact
as it travels through the body, that is until it reaches a location
of no oxygen.
When it reaches this "no oxygen" location, the coating falls apart
releasing the chemotherapy to destroy the cancer, because the only
place in your body where there is no oxygen is the cancer site.
Then there are the food therapies: aimed at starving cancer.
Knowing what cancer loves, the patient avoids them.
Cancers loves cooked foods (this is a relatively recent finding) and
cancer loves sugar.
If you hate your cancer, then starve it.
Wellness Directory of Minnesota Home Page
Copyright © 1995, 1998, 1999, 2000
Wellness Directory of Minnesota
763-689-WELL (9355)
You may copy, print, reprint, and/or transfer this entire article,
if and only if it is unmodified and in its complete state with this
copyright notice attached and all the links work properly.
http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/nutrition/sugar.htm
In Reply to: Buddies: Sugar and cancer. (Archive in cancer.) posted by Walt Stoll on November 20, 2003 at 16:46:55:
Good to hear others are having such great results with the breath work as we have had. We've also seen cancer lumps disappear this same way; Always when the Wellness Ranch experiencing cancer they get a series of breath session and put on a whole food plan and always told about the effects of Sugar or any sweeteners feeding the cancer cells; Our friend Virgil-Walt, noticed when he turned his cancer around that sugar was a big culpret to spreading the cancer when he ate it; He turned his cancer around with eating a very alkaline food plan and keeping his bowells clean;
Glad to hear the information is Out there!! He will be thrilled as i am!
In Reply to: Buddies: Sugar and cancer. (Archive in cancer.) posted by Walt Stoll on November 20, 2003 at 16:46:55:
The wasting syndrome, *cachexia*, is the body producing sugar from proteins (you heard it right, not from carbohydrates or fats, but from proteins) in a process called glycogenesis.
This sugar feeds the cancer. The body finally dies of starvation, trying to feed the cancer.
Now, knowing that one's cancer needs sugar, does it make sense to feed it sugar? Does it make sense to have a high protein diet?
Well, if you feed the body little protein, then cancer will use body's protein to make sugar, won't it? I know that high protein diets have been used (successfully) to cure cancer. In a particular case I am thinking about, raw meat was used (to cure cancer in a dog).
On the other hand, maybe making the body switch to burn fat as opposed to sugar would be the best idea. And that is usually accomplished with low sugar diets (high protein/whatever fat, as in Atkins, or high fat diets, as in Kwasnievski's (sp?)).
In Reply to: Re: Buddies: Sugar and cancer. (Archive in cancer.) posted by R. on November 20, 2003 at 21:13:08:
R you are back, & making such sense. :)
In Reply to: Buddies: Sugar and cancer. (Archive in cancer.) posted by Walt Stoll on November 20, 2003 at 16:46:55:
Interesting stuff.
I also find it interesting that the cancer center in my area runs a PSA on one of the local radio stations about their men's group (presumably patients and survivors) meetings. The part that always gets me is when they say "Coffee and donuts will be served." Duh.
Nutmeg
|
[ Cancer and Prostate Archive ] [ Main Archives Page ] [ Glossary/Index ] [ FAQ ] [ Recommended Books ] [ Bulletin Board ] |
Search this site! | |