|
[ CODEX Archive ] [ Main Archives Page ] [ Glossary/Index ] [ FAQ ] [ Recommended Books ] [ Bulletin Board ] |
Search this site! | |
I just checked an excellent website that provides information on Congressional bills, their status, text, etc. SR 722 has been referred to a committee and has not become law, YET.
USA Law Proposed to Restrict Supplements
US Law vs Supplements
All Americans may lose their access to nutritional supplements.
There is a bill in the Senate right now, the so-called "Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2003 (S. 722)" that will give one person in the FDA absolute power to decide which food supplements you may or may not use.
Do you think this is right? The FDA has a history of hostility to vitamins. The bill will give them total control over both the availability and dosage of all supplements, including vitamins. The Secretary of the FDA will have the personal power to make safety determinations for supplements based on just a single "adverse report" about a supplement, a report that does not even have to be proven to even be caused by the supplement!
You may find this hard to believe, so at the very bottom of this page you will find the proposed bill in its entirety. But first, I have highlighted the worst passages, which YOU should highlight when you write to your US Senator. Please write today! You can get your senator's addresses right at http://www.congress.org (or http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home). For writing hints and a letter you can use, read on.
SUPPLEMENT RESTRICTION: AMERICA IS THE NEXT TARGET
Make no mistake about it: there is a movement afoot to take away your access to vitamin supplements in the USA, as in Europe. If passed, Senate bill S. 722, the so-called "Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2003" will insure that this happens.
For example, this proposed law contains the following words:
`SEC. 416. ADVERSE EXPERIENCES WITH DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS. (a) DEFINITIONS
"(1) ADVERSE DIETARY SUPPLEMENT EXPERIENCE-
The term `adverse dietary supplement experience' means an
adverse event that is associated with the use of a dietary supplement in a human, without regard to whether the event is known to be causally related to the dietary supplement."
Think about that and re-read it. This is federal legislation based on hear-say. Do you think that is a good idea?
How about this section:
`(d) SAFETY REVIEW FOR POSSIBLY DANGEROUS DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS
`(1) IN GENERAL- If a clinical evaluation by the Secretary (of the FDA) of 1 or more serious adverse events indicates that a dietary supplement or a dietary ingredient contained in a dietary supplement appears to present a significant or unreasonable risk of illness, the Secretary may require the manufacturers of the dietary supplement, or of a dietary ingredient contained in a dietary supplement, to submit to the Secretary data demonstrating that the dietary supplement containing the dietary ingredient is safe.
`(2) APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF CONTINUED MARKETING- As soon as practicable after receiving data required under paragraph
(1), the Secretary shall review the data and issue a determination that--
`(A)(i) the dietary supplement is safe; and
`(ii) the continued marketing of the dietary supplement is approved; or
`(B)(i) the dietary supplement is not safe or has not been shown to be safe under ordinary or frequent conditions of use; and
`(ii) the continued marketing of the dietary supplement is disapproved.'.
THIS WORDING GIVES THE SECRETARY OF THE U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION ABSOLUTE POWER TO REGULATE EVERY SINGLE SUPPLEMENT.
Do you think that is right?
(To read the rest of this proposed law, scroll down to the bottom of this page.)
http://www.greatestherbsonearth.com/nsparticles/ama_dshea.htm contains a good commentary article on S. 722, with a ready-to-print-and-use form letter provided at http://www.greatestherbsonearth.com/nsparticles/s722_letter.htm so you can write to your senator immediately. (I have no financial connection with this website, and make no recommendation or endorsement of its products or other commercial content.)
You can send your comments electronically, by email, for free, at http://www.congress.org. I just cut-and-pasted the form letter into a plain text format ("Notepad") and then edited it a bit. You can, too, or if you prefer you can just use my letter, below, which I have already to both my U.S. Senators.
Here it is:
Dear Senator:
I respectfully urge you to do all in your power to kill S-722 (the "Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2003," introduced March 26th, 2003 by Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-IL). The bill's intent is to overturn the main provisions of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA).
I think S-722 and its congressional backers will be very unpopular with the American people. I can say this because more citizen letters were sent to Congress in 1992-1994 in support of DSHEA than over any other issue in American history. If you have a hand in overturning the freedoms that DSHEA provides, voters will strongly disapprove.
DSHEA was enacted after years of debate in Congress. During the process, it became very clear that there was overwhelming public support for ensuring free access to dietary supplements.
S-722 would give the FDA the potential power to remove thousands of herbs and other dietary supplements from the marketplace, as it has tried to do many times already, literally for decades. S-722 would give FDA complete discretion to make such a determination. That is wrong. It was the will of the people and of Congress, as stated in DSHEA, that supplement availability in America is not to be regulated or restricted.
S-722 would require premarket approval for caffeine in herbs and dietary supplements but would specifically exempt manufacturers of drugs and foods like coffee, tea, and soft drinks from that requirement. Do you really think that is right?
You are almost certainly most concerned with the safety of your constituents, but you may not be aware of this: There is not even one death per year from vitamins. S. 722 gives FDA power to control access to vitamins, and not just other, more questionable products. And as for unsafe products, you should be fully aware that DSHEA already provides FDA with very ample authority to remove any dangerous product at any time. FDA has always had this authority. They still have it. S. 722 is essentially a power grab that undermines DSHEA and the rights of your constituents.
Please oppose S. 722, and please write back to me on this subject.
Respectfully yours,
Andrew W. Saul
My Senator's office tells me that we can check and see to what extent this bill is making progress at http://thomas.loc.gov
There is more information, and important links, concerning attempts to restrict access to vitamin supplements at
http://www.doctoryourself.com/news/v3n21.txt and
http://www.doctoryourself.com/supplement_limit.html.
Abram Hoffer, M.D., offers this comment on Europe's recently approved, continent-wide ban on consumer access to vitamin supplements:
"Your recent newsletter http://www.doctoryourself.com/news/v3n21.txt)proves very clearly that modern medicine is not scientific, that it is full of prejudice, illogic and susceptible to advertising. Doctors are not taught to reason. They are programmed to believe in whatever their medical schools teach them and the leading doctors tell them. And over the past 20 years the drug companies with their enormous wealth have taken medicine over and now control its research, what is taught and the information released to the public. Very important information in your newsletter. If the European Union has its way, all consumer access to nutrients throughout Europe will be prohibited, while the massive drug companies will still be permitted to experiment all they like with their dangerous potions."
Please write to both your Senators today. And how about sending a letter to your local newspaper? My easy how-to hints to help you are at
http://www.doctoryourself.com/write_now.html
"When I feel the heat, I see the light." (Senator Everett Dirksen)
WRITE TO OPPOSE S. 722 (AND SUPPORT S. 1538 INSTEAD!)
Senators Tom Harkin and Orrin Hatch have introduced an excellent alternative to the draconian S. 722, a bill that would give the Secretary of the FDA absolute power to personally decide which supplements will or will not be available to you. (Details on this are at http://www.doctoryourself.com/news/Extra%20092603.txt)
The alternative, far better bill is the "DSHEA Full Implementation and Enforcement Act of 2003 (S. 1538)." This bill will help the Food and Drug Administration enforce the current and fully adequate safety law, the "Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994" (DSHEA).
From the letters page at http://www.congress.org:
"Even though the two most recent FDA commissioners have said that they (already) have the power to ensure dietary supplements are safe for American consumers, the agency has also expressed concern that it doesn't have enough funding to enforce the current law. S. 1538 will provide funding that is consistent with FDA's needs and will also require the agency to file annual reports to Congress about how DSHEA is being implemented and enforced."
We should support Senators Harkin and Hatch in their efforts to pass this bill. Please write to both your U.S. Senators and ask them to oppose S. 722, and instead co-sponsor S. 1538.
This is serious. If we do not act now, we can expect to lose our access to nutrition supplements just as has already happened in Europe. (http://www.doctoryourself.com/news/v3n21.txt)
It can happen here. Don't let it! Get your Senators' addresses, and write to them both today. Their addresses are easy to find at http://www.congress.org (or http://congress.org/congressorg/home). You can send an email letter to them directly from that website, but remember this: A HANDWRITTEN, PLAIN-OLD U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 37-CENT LETTER **ALWAYS** HAS MORE IMPACT. When you write, be sure to ask for a response from your senators. . . and please share those responses with me at drsaul@doctoryourself.com, would you?
In Reply to: "When I feel the heat, I see the light." Sen. Dirksen posted by Mary [69.123] on February 19, 2004 at 01:04:11:
I don't know if it should be the FDA, but for arguments sake, I do believe there has to be SOME kind of a police on supplements. There are so many companies out there making billions of dollars on supplements and they have NO regulations. They could claim ANYTHING and we have no way of knowing if it is true unless we analyze it ourselves.
Just to give you an example. A friend of mine once took three of the same supplements from three different companies (The exact supplement escapes me, but I will find out) to a friend of hers that works in a lab. They put them to the test and only one came even close to having in it what it claimed. The other two didn't even have a fraction. What does that say you you?
At least if the FDA is involved, they will be testing supplements so that you know what they say is in there, really is in there.
In Reply to: Re: "When I feel the heat, I see the light." Sen. Dirksen posted by Mary K. [46.32] on February 19, 2004 at 08:35:27:
Hi Mary K:
It would be helpful if you could remember the exact supplement your friend tested, and also the exact test results.
Does your friend routinely check supplements and is he/she familiar with the proper procedure for testing supplements?
As for getting the FDA involved, that would only make things worse for the supplement industry. The FDA has repeatedly approved drugs that were unsafe and even proved to be deadly. The FDA are crooks. I don't trust them one bit. Well, maybe a little bit on some things:-)
I believe the supplement industry still has certain rules they must abide by. In other words, if they claim a capsule contains 300mg of a certain herb, it must contain that dosage and that herb. Overall, they do a good job of self-regulating themselves. They do rely on satisfied customers to stay in business. Continued customer disatisfaction would surely bring an end to any business.
In Reply to: "When I feel the heat, I see the light." Sen. Dirksen posted by Mary [69.123] on February 19, 2004 at 01:04:11:
Thanks, Mary.
"We have met the enemy and he is us! "Public apathy is the only reason they could get away with this!
Walt
In Reply to: Re: "When I feel the heat, I see the light." Sen. Dirksen (Archive in CODEX.) posted by Walt Stoll [9.8] on February 20, 2004 at 08:44:18:
And sickened by it. That's one reason why I don't post as much as I did last year. Very few people seem to realize or care that soon we Americans will no longer be able to obtain supplements. People just sit on their you-no-what's!
Walt, I don't know what it would take to get people to act.
MAYBE WHEN IT'S TOO LATE, but by definition...
In Reply to: Re: "When I feel the heat, I see the light." Sen. Dirksen posted by Mary K. [46.32] on February 19, 2004 at 08:35:27:
Sorry, Mary, but if you really understood the situation, you wouldn't be making this sort of comment.
In Reply to: I'm surprised at all the apathy on this board, of all places! posted by Mary [69.123] on February 20, 2004 at 20:56:49:
Hi Mary:
Many people do care, and don't want to see their supplements taken away. But they just don't know what to do to keep them. Dr. Stoll has posted repeatedly about the dangers of losing our supplements, and so has Peterb.
Why don't you tell us what you do, Mary, so we can follow suit. I'm serious. Be our guiding light.
In Reply to: Re: I'm surprised at all the apathy on this board, of all places! posted by PhillyLady [57.41] on February 20, 2004 at 21:07:34:
There's all kinds of info on this board and what people can do if they were really serious.
For example, you can contact John (can't think of his last name at the moment) of International Health Freedom Advocates.
I've noticed that nearly everytime Walt or Misty or Peterb or John or myself post on CODEX, very, very few people comment and yet when there is an "attack thread" on the board, sometimes there are as many as 67-70 comments.
In Reply to: Re: I'm surprised at all the apathy on this board, of all places! posted by Mary [69.123] on February 22, 2004 at 21:09:40:
I just remembered John's last name - John Hammel of International Health Freedom Advocates.
|
[ CODEX Archive ] [ Main Archives Page ] [ Glossary/Index ] [ FAQ ] [ Recommended Books ] [ Bulletin Board ] |
Search this site! | |