|
[ Consciousness Archive ] [ Main Archives Page ] [ Glossary/Index ] [ FAQ ] [ Recommended Books ] [ Bulletin Board ] |
Search this site! | |
Hello everyone. Tonight I went to see What The Bleep Do We Know. It hit the San Francisco bay area last night. I decided to drive up and see it in the city tonight rather than wait for it to come down to the peninsula in Aug., because there was a discussion afterwards with two of the three filmmakers. I couldn’t possibly miss that opportunity! I ordered my ticket over the phone in the morning, and I recommend it, as both nights were sold out.
Anyway, it was absolutely compelling and fascinating, and it was certainly as good as Nutmeg, Renee, and others have claimed. I can understand why they wanted to see it so many times. It was filled to the brim with incredible scientific and spell bounding information, but the pace was extremely fast. There was no way anyone could absorb all that was there. So I plan to get the DVD when it comes out, and that way I can pause and linger as long as I need to. And in the meantime, I’ll definitely see it again. I actually can’t wait.
Anyway, I’ve included below some of the points that stuck with me. I really hope that you don’t feel I’ve spoiled it for you, that is not my intention at all, but just to share the experience until people can see it for themselves, and to wet your appetites some...
And that’s another thing, I do highly recommend people on here see it. It emphasizes the power of the body/mind connection, and puts it into a larger perspective.
It’s also done extremely well, the style is very unique and compelling and it somehow managed to weave together a story and plot along with a documentary, which is very inventive and not easy to do.
So on that note, some of the movie’s points lie below. And if I got anything wrong, which I may have because I didn’t even take any notes, please feel free to correct me, the people that saw the movie that is.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
The power of our brain, the power of our mind, the power of our thoughts are massive.
We can actually restructure our brain as our thoughts are responsible for neuro-chemicals, neural connections, and lack thereof.
The brain doesn’t distinguish between what it sees and what it remembers.
There are parallel existences and things can be in more than one place at a time.
Matter is actually intention, it happens because we decide to see it at that moment.
The particles in matter actually move in and out, and are not static.
Matter is not as dense as we thought it was. There is much more space then we realize.
Our thoughts actually change the physical structure of water, and we humans consist of about 95% water.
Our thoughts have a profound impact on our cells and consequentially our physical and mental well-being. They are much more powerful than we know.
Our minds are actually processing millions or billions of information bits per second, but we can only absorb about 2000 bits in that timeframe.
Our brain makes comparisons when we encounter information, and only imprints that which is different. Therefore, if it isn’t seen as different by our brain’s automatic comparison mechanism, then it isn’t absorbed. If we have a faulty comparison mechanism, we loose our ability to retain information.
Our mind only accepts that which it sees, it’s own little reality, and so can exclude a lot.
We can become addicted to our emotions, which are peptides [chemicals]. If we produce too much or too little we are not functioning properly.
Peptides are manufactured in the hypothalamus and are uniquely created to fit each emotion.
Cells, information, and neural networks are interconnected, and thus explains our associations.
Things are not static but in reality are in constant motion.
We only experience them as dense static matter, and only when we decide to.
Quantum mechanics is where it’s at!!!!!
gabriella
In Reply to: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [180.890] on July 25, 2004 at 02:21:59:
I forgot to mention that aging, or the effects of aging, is due to the loss of one's ability to either absorb or manufacture protein. That's important.
In Reply to: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [180.890] on July 25, 2004 at 02:21:59:
tks for posting and outlining.. this.. I am really excited
hurry up and git it up here
blessings..
Sedona >>
In Reply to: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [180.890] on July 25, 2004 at 02:21:59:
Hi Gabriella,
I was there too. Where were you sitting? I was sitting on the right (my right side), third (?) row from the back. I actually moved to the back during the previews(too close for comfort)
Awesome...So awesome. You forgot to mention that Fred Wolf the scientist was also there answering questions. Betsy Chasse(one of the filmakers) had brought her beautiful baby which someone was holding off to the side while she answered questions.
Great job of summarizing the ideas of the film. I'm definitely going to see it again. I actually found the film very moving as well as humorous and informative. There was one scene in particular which really hit home and I was actually brought to tears. Also that wedding reception was absolutely hilarious.
I have a question about when one of the scientists mentions an experiment done on a particle. He mentions that, surprisingly, in the experiment there are actually 2 particles where there should be one. I would think there would be infinite particles. I was going to ask Dr. Wolf, but didn't.
That's so interesting about the comparison between what our brain processes(400 Billion bits per second) and what it absorbs(2000 bits). Although I think that might be reversed(400 Billion absorbed vs 2000 bits processed). I really have to see this film again. Apparently we get all this information, but we can't process it right away and it gets stored while our brain ruminates over it all untill it eventually makes some kind of sense. Hee..Hee..I just realized that the last sentence describes a reason to see the film again.
I hope everyone in the world sees this film.
Jean
In Reply to: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [180.890] on July 25, 2004 at 02:21:59:
Hi Gabriella,
Thank you for your notes, I'd have to see the movie when I'm in Spokane next month. Hope it's still showing there then...
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by mimi [1540.108] on July 25, 2004 at 11:12:06:
Hi Mimi, you're welcome, and here's the schedule page, hopefully there's some way you can see it. If not, it will be out on DVD!
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [87.890] on July 25, 2004 at 12:00:34:
~~~
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by Jean [2065.10] on July 25, 2004 at 07:32:07:
Hiya Jean. Actually I had a feeling that you were there last night, and I kept looking at different women thinking to myself, "Is that Jean"? Too bad we didn't coordinate or we could have met there.
Anyway, I was sitting dead center about the 8th row up, just where the rows really started to rise. I was the second person in the theatre, got there an hour ahead and sat in my 'perfect' seat the whole hour. Then just as the previews started I had to go to the bathroom, what a dodo.
_______
"You forgot to mention that Fred Wolf the scientist was also there answering questions."
Yes, I didn't mention him probably because I was so impressed with him in the film but not as much in person. I'm sure he's much brighter than he sounded last night, he must have been tired.
________
"Betsy Chasse(one of the filmakers) had brought her beautiful baby which someone was holding off to the side while she answered questions."
Yes, he was really cute, but personally I didn't care for his crying, I felt it hard to hear the Q and A. I'm glad it finally stopped!
________
"Great job of summarizing the ideas of the film."
Thanks, I wrote it up while it was still fresh in my mind. All 2000 bits of it!
________
"I'm definitely going to see it again."
How can we not, it's just too good!
__________
"I actually found the film very moving as well as humorous and informative. There was one scene in particular which really hit home and I was actually brought to tears. Also that wedding reception was absolutely hilarious."
I agree, I liked the story as well. Was it the infidelity scene that brought tears? Most women can relate on some level to that...
________
"I have a question about when one of the scientists mentions an experiment done on a particle. He mentions that, surprisingly, in the experiment there are actually 2 particles where there should be one. I would think there would be infinite particles. I was going to ask Dr. Wolf, but didn't."
This is a very good question Jean, maybe you can email them and ask it, I'd love to know that answer. I like to go to the author lectures at Kepler's, an independent bookstore in Menlo Park. One time I went home, looked up the author's website, sent him and question via email and he answered, so you never know...
___________
"That's so interesting about the comparison between what our brain processes(400 Billion bits per second) and what it absorbs(2000 bits)."
It is indeed.
_________
"Although I think that might be reversed(400 Billion absorbed vs 2000 bits processed)."
That's hysterical Jean, and sooooo true...
_____
"Apparently we get all this information, but we can't process it right away and it gets stored while our brain ruminates over it all untill it eventually makes some kind of sense. Hee..Hee..I just realized that the last sentence describes a reason to see the film again."
Yes, you said it. However, didn't you find that the film moved through the technical information at a rapid pace? I mean it certainly holds one's interest, but then people have to keep going back to get it all. What a fantastic marketing ploy!!! That's why I can't wait for the DVD.
~ ~ ~
gabriella
In Reply to: cant wait for it.. when is it in Canada..wonder?? movie! posted by Sedona [1884.81] on July 25, 2004 at 06:27:39:
You're so welcome Sedona [sweet pea]! I think you'll really like and appreciate it. Check the link out for show dates and don't forget about the DVD. Let us know what you think when you see it.
cheers,
gabriella
In Reply to: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [180.890] on July 25, 2004 at 02:21:59:
Thanks, Gabriella, I'm planning on seeing it today!
Sapphire
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by Sapphire [422.532] on July 25, 2004 at 13:17:40:
Oh that's great Sapphire! I hope you enjoy it as much as Jean, Nutmeg, Renee, and I did. Let us know what you think.
Will you be seeing it in S.F.? I think you live out here don't you?
In Reply to: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [180.890] on July 25, 2004 at 02:21:59:
I loved it too - saw it twice and intend to get the DVD! Thanks for posting ...
KMD~*
In Reply to: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [180.890] on July 25, 2004 at 02:21:59:
Hi Gabriella:
"...Our thoughts actually change the physical structure of water, and we humans consist of about 95% water."
It's been my personal belief that whenever a Catholic priest blesses water to make it holy, he is in essence mimicking ancient spiritual (Pagan?) practices, perhaps from a time when Man felt the Earth/Soul/Universe connection. At some point someone realized that water could be infused with certain energies, and more importantly that it could RETAIN those energies.
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by KMD [517.155] on July 25, 2004 at 17:38:38:
You're welcome KMD, it was a great film. Thank goodness for the DVD, I think it will make a great reference tool, don't you? Are you planning on doing any reading on the subject matter?
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [87.890] on July 26, 2004 at 00:53:28:
Hi gabriella, I've been reading about all this stuff for many years (11+ years) - it was great to see it visually presented on the movie screen. I love seeing this becoming more and more mainstream. We have a long way to go, but it's on its way :-)
What I would *really* love is to find a group of people who like to get together and discuss or study these things (I have many friends like this online, but very few in person that are interested in this stuff.)
KMD~*
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by PhillyLady [1906.41] on July 25, 2004 at 20:05:50:
Hi Philly,
Yes, it sounds very plausible. It's amazing how much human beings knew, especially in underdeveloped [only by our standards of course] cultures. Do you remember my post about the weeping camel and how the natives in the Siberian Tundra unblocked that camel and enabled him to bond with his offspring?
It's also amazing how adept the Catholic Church has been in adopting and absorbing certain traditions and rituals that had real meaning, more meaning than was realized. It's too bad we've grown so disconnected from that "Earth/Soul/Universe connection".
"At some point someone realized that water could be infused with certain energies, and more importantly that it could RETAIN those energies."
And if we are 95% water then WE retain those energies, specifically our thoughts...
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by KMD [517.155] on July 26, 2004 at 00:59:50:
Hi KMD, I think it's wonderful that you've been reading about this stuff for so long. You must really be thrilled at it infiltrating mainstream a bit. I do understand how you feel about wanting to talk about this material. I have been interested in it for a while myself, but most people don't seem that interested.
Is there a website that you might find, perhaps "What the Bleep" forum itself? Or perhaps a site or group based on quantum mechanics? Perhaps if you're near a university there might be a group of people into it. Let me know what you find, I might be interested myself.
In Reply to: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [180.890] on July 25, 2004 at 02:21:59:
Thanks, Gabriella.
I was giving a 2 hour slide lecture about this 20 years ago and called it my "Cosmic Slide Show". I still have it set up but have stopped giving it to other than interesterd friends as I had dispaired of most people's understanding it.
Your review gives me hope that more money and 20 years of further scientific proof of these truths will do a better job than I was able to do. I will definitely get the DVD when it comes out. Maybe I can finally disband my slide show :o).
Thanks, again.
Walt
In Reply to: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! Archive. posted by Walt Stoll [9.8] on July 26, 2004 at 06:47:04:
we can become addicted to our emotions--if they've been negative are you saying we will not feel comfortable unless we keep those negative emotions? Then we have to break those emotions for other positive ones.
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [87.890] on July 26, 2004 at 01:02:52:
Hi Gabriella:
Yes, I do remember the post about the weeping camel.
I believe the human body is about 75% water, very similar to the earth's water-solid ratio which is also approximately 75% water. So, retaining negative thoughts through the body's "waters" would certainly affect the body.
Interestingly, the medieval practice of healing by diagnosing the condition of the four humours doesn't sound so far-fetched, considering that the humours are the body's water channels.
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [87.890] on July 26, 2004 at 01:08:12:
Hi gabriella, the movie's website does have a message board, if you are interested.
www.whatthebleep.com
find "the community" (on the left) and then click on "forum".
You may also want to look up International IONS groups ... they meet to discuss these things. I was disappointed to find there are none close to me at this time.
KMD~*
In Reply to: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! Archive. posted by Walt Stoll [9.8] on July 26, 2004 at 06:47:04:
Thanks Walt.
It's impressive that you had packaged this knowledge into a video that many years back. You are ahead of your time, no doubt, and that can be bittersweet as you well know.
I'm glad you're getting the DVD, it's definitely worth having, but it would be a shame to disband the Cosmic Slide Show. It's proof that you were on the right track early on, and there's something so special about a home grown show, it's extremely quaint and personal. Is there any way that we can see it?
namaste'
gabriella
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [151.890] on July 25, 2004 at 13:48:11:
Gabriella,
I live in Southern California, and did see it yesterday. It was wonderful. I went with my boyfriend, and I could tell during the first 20 minutes or so that he thought it was going to be really boring, but at the end he said he loved it, and that he wants his 15 year old daughter to see it. BTW, your summary of the points in the movie was perfect!
Sapphire
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by PhillyLady [1906.913] on July 26, 2004 at 09:12:46:
Hi Philly,
As for the percentage of water in one's body, I was trying to retain as much information from the movie as I possibly could, and probably got that wrong. Thanks for the correction, if it's valid.
I agree with you, and as I've said before, past and indigenous cultures somehow instinctively knew what to do, at least it was pretty good in their day, for example:
~~~~~~~~
"The theory of the four humours
Greek thinkers emphasised the idea of balance in all things, including medicine. They believed in the importance of a balanced lifestyle; to eat in moderation, take some exercise, sleep regularly and keep clean. In their search for the natural basis of all things, these thinkers came up with the four elements: earth, air, fire and water.
These elements were linked to the four seasons and also to the four "humours" inside each human being: yellow bile, black bile, blood and phlegm.
They believed that imbalance in any of these caused illness. Doctors could restore the balance by treating patients e.g. if a patient had a fever, his body needed cooling to restore the balance of humours therefore a cold drink might be prescribed.
Doctors used a handbook called a vademecum containing various charts, for example to compare the colour of a patient's urine, which helped them to diagnose illness."
humours 1
_____________________
Medieval Themes and Topics: Some Interesting and Essential Stuff
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Four Humours*:
A traditional theory of physiology in which the state of health--and by extension the state of mind, or character--depended upon a balance among the four elemental fluids: blood, yellow bile, phlegm, and black bile. These were closely allied with the four elements (air, fire, water, and earth). Their correspondence is described as follows:
BLOOD YELLOW BILE PHLEGM BLACK BILE
Air Fire Water Earth
hot and moist hot and dry cold and moist cold and dry
"SANGUINE" "CHOLERIC" "PHLEGMATIC" "MELANCHOLIC"
(amorous, happy, generous) (violent, vengeful) (dull, pale, cowardly) (gluttonous, lazy, sentimental)
The "humours" gave off vapors which ascended to the brain; an individual's personal characteristics (physical, mental, moral) were explained by his or her "temperament," or the state of theat person's "humours." The perfect temperament resulted when no one of these humours dominated. By 1600 it was common to use "humour" as a means of classifying characters; knowledge of the humours is not only important to understanding later medieval work, but essential to interpreting Elizabethan drama, especially the late-16th century genre known as the "comedy of humours" (cf. Ben Jonson).
_________________
Four humours
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from Bodily humour)
The four humours were four fluids that were supposed to permeate the body and influence its health. The concept was developed by ancient Greek thinkers around 400 BC and it was directly linked with another popular theory of the four elements (Empedocles). Paired qualities were associated with each humour and its season. The four humours, their corresponding elements, seasons and sites of formation, and resulting temperaments are:
Humour Season Element Organ Qualities Temperament Characteristics
Blood spring air liver warm & moist sanguine courageous, hopeful, amorous
Phlegm winter water brain/lungs cold & moist phlegmatic calm, unemotional
Yellow bile summer fire gall bladder warm & dry choleric easily angered, bad tempered
Black bile autumn earth spleen cold & dry melancholic despondant, sleepless, irritable
It is believed that Hippocrates was the one who applied this idea to medicine. "Humoralism" or the doctrine of the Four Temperaments as a medical theory retained its popularity for centuries largely through the influence of the writings of Galen (131–201 CE) and was decisively displaced only in 1858 by Rudolf Virchow's newly-published theories of cellular pathology. While Galen thought that humours were formed in the body, rather than ingested, he believed that different foods had varying potential to be acted upon by the body to produce different humours. Warm foods, for example, tended to produce yellow bile, while cold foods tended to produce phlegm. Seasons of the year, periods of life, geographic regions and occupations also influenced the nature of the humours formed.
The imbalance of humours, or "dyscrasia", was thought to be the direct cause of all diseases. Health was associated with a balance of humours, or eucrasia. The qualities of the humours, in turn, influenced the nature of the diseases they caused. Yellow bile caused warm diseases and phlegm caused cold diseases.
In On the Temperaments Galen further emphasized the importance of the qualities. An ideal temperament involved a balanced mixture of the four qualities. Galen identified four temperaments in which one of the qualities, warm, cold, moist and dry, predominated and four more in which a combination of two, warm and moist, warm and dry, cold and dry and cold and moist, dominated. These last four, named for the humours with which they were associated—that is, sanguine, choleric, melancholic and phlegmatic, eventually became better known than the others. While the term "temperament" came to refer just to psychological dispositions, Galen used it to refer to bodily dispositions, which determined a person's susceptibility to particular diseases as well as behavioral and emotional inclinations.
Methods of treatment like blood letting, emetics and purges were aimed at expelling a harmful surplus of a humour. They were still in the mainstream of American medicine after the Civil War.
Although completely refuted by modern science, the theory formed basis of thinking about causes of health problems for more than a thousand years. It was first seriously challenged only just before the 18th century. (this needs expanding)
There are still remnants of the theory of the four humours in the current medical language. For example, we refer to humoral immunity or humoral regulation to mean substances like hormones and antibodies that are circulated throughout the body, or use the term blood dyscrasia to refer to any blood disease or abnormality.
The theory was a modest advance over the previous views on human health that tried to explain in terms of the divine. Since then practitioners have started to look for natural causes of disease and to provide natural treatments.
The Unani school of Indian medicine, still apparently practiced in India, is very similar to Galenic medicine in its emphasis on the four humors, and in treatments based on controlling intake, general environment, and the use of purging as a way of relieving humoral imbalances.
humours 3
__________
And finally, yes if we study water we will have a pretty good idea about ourselves. There is a man from the movie that specializes in that his name is Emoto I believe.
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by KMD [517.155] on July 26, 2004 at 10:28:29:
Hi KMD,
I know about their forum [what the bleep] that's why I was recommending it to you, but thanks just the same.
I'll check out the IONS group, that does sound good, doesn't it? Too bad there's none by you, but maybe something on the web will come up for you eventually, I'll keep my fingers crossed.
~~~
gabriella
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! Archive. posted by J [20.97] on July 26, 2004 at 07:28:39:
It looks like you were talking to Walt but I'll pipe in briefly anyway.
You said, "we can become addicted to our emotions" and that's exactly what they claimed in the movie and I agree, and that goes for positive as well as negative emotions.
It's actually a chemical dependency they said. And yes, you are exactly right, I think they said to replace negative addictions with better ones [better habits], in which case one would be rewiring their brains. Amazing that we can have that much control! This is also called behavior modification.
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by Sapphire [422.532] on July 26, 2004 at 11:24:10:
Hi Sapphire,
Oh you live down there, I went to school and lived in Los Angeles for many years. I had a lot of fun there. Which city do you live in? I was in Westwood mostly.
I'm really glad you and your boyfriend enjoyed the movie. I too was not sure how I was going to like it in the first few minutes but after about the same amount of time [15min] I was sure, I was hooked. It's great that he's going to take his daughter, the sooner people are exposed to the concepts the better.
And thanks for the compliment, I tried to remember as much as I could about the movie at 1:00 am upon arriving home. It wasn't easy after a scoop of mint chip ice cream and a long drive home...
~~~
gabriella
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! Archive. posted by gabriella [180.890] on July 26, 2004 at 11:19:37:
It would be great if the slide show pictures were posted on this website. Dr. Stoll, if you dictated a narrative to go along with the slide show, I'm sure there would be people who'd be happy to transcribe it (I'd volunteer) so that it could be posted along with the pictures.
Sapphire
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [180.890] on July 26, 2004 at 12:29:09:
Hi Gabriella,
I used to live in Westwood, too, when I was going to college there. Now I live in south Orange County in the Newport Beach area. I had to drive all the way to Encinitas to see the movie, about and hour and a half with the Sunday beach traffic. But it was definitely worth the drive!
Sapphire
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by Sapphire [422.532] on July 26, 2004 at 15:22:41:
Hi Sapphire,
Wow, that's a long ride, especially in the Sunday beach traffic, ouch. But it gave you a chance to think and talk about the movie on the way home I bet.
Newport is beautiful, big waves, scary but fun, and not cheap! Did you go to UCLA by any chance?
gabriella
In Reply to: Re: cant wait for it.. when is it in Canada..wonder?? movie! posted by gabriella [87.890] on July 25, 2004 at 12:26:47:
p
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [180.890] on July 26, 2004 at 12:15:10:
Hi Gabriella:
Thanks for the great links. Some are familiar:-) I remember them from having done a search on the humours a while back. There seems to be a similarity of ideas with ancient Chinese medicine especially as they pertain to the concept of dry/moist conditions within the human body.
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [87.890] on July 26, 2004 at 15:41:18:
Hi Gabriella,
Yes, UCLA is my alma mater. You, too?
Sapphire
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by PhillyLady [1906.41] on July 26, 2004 at 17:27:58:
Hi Philly,
You're quite welcome, hope you enjoy them. I also noticed the similarity with Chinese medicine and yin/yang treatments, it's a small world, and it's amazing how information and knowledge is so pervasive in the most surprising of ways.
I've always had an interest in that area [chinese medicine], so someday I'll explore it. I'm trying to get my mother to go in that direction but she's sooooo stubborn she won't be my guinea pig, fancy that.
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by Sapphire [422.532] on July 26, 2004 at 17:52:46:
Hi Sapphire,
YEAH, me too, GO Bruins!!! Did you enjoy it, what did you major in?
gabriella
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by gabriella [180.890] on July 26, 2004 at 19:15:39:
Hi Gabriella,
Yeah, go Bruins! Had a lot of fun there, but I don't miss LA that much. Economics was my major. What about you?
Sapphire
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! posted by Sapphire [422.532] on July 27, 2004 at 00:34:55:
Hi Sapphire,
Economics is a great, pragmatic major that can be applied in lots of good ways I imagine, or at least as a good foundation. I on the other hand went in a completely different direction, Art History undergraduate and Architecture graduate. Then I went and became a software developer after a few years anyway, but I'm back now, studying interior design and hoping to do some painting on the side.
What are you doing now if I might ask?
And as far as not missing LA, I can see that, especially if you live in Newport Beach, such a deal!!!
~~~
gabriella
In Reply to: Re: What the bleep do I know? Well, more now, I saw the movie! Archive. posted by J [20.97] on July 26, 2004 at 07:28:39:
Thanks, J.
??????
Walt
|
[ Consciousness Archive ] [ Main Archives Page ] [ Glossary/Index ] [ FAQ ] [ Recommended Books ] [ Bulletin Board ] |
Search this site! | |