Diabetes Archives

Diabetes curable. (Archive in diabetes.) REFERENCE.

Thanks, Misty.

Getting this information out to the public is long overdue.

Namaste`

Walt

----- Original Message -----
From: "Misty L. Trepke"
To:
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 9:45 PM
Subject: [S-A] [SecretsRevealed] Deadly Diabetes Deception

>
>
> Comments?
> Misty L. Trepke
> http://www.searching-alternatives.com
>
> Our Deadly Diabetes Deception" [long, but very INSIGHTFUL]
>
> Our Deadly Diabetes Deception
> By Thomas Smith
> 10-18-4
>
> Diabetes introduction
>
> If you are an American diabetic, your physician will never tell you
> that most diabetes is curable. In fact, if you even mention the cure
> word around him, he will likely become upset and irrational. His
> medical school training only allows him to respond to the word
> treatment.
>
> For him, the cure word does not exist. Diabetes, in its modern
> epidemic form, is a curable disease and has been for at least 40
> years.
>
> In 2001, the most recent year for which figures US figures are
> posted, 934,550 Americans died from out of control symptoms of this
> disease.[1]
>
> Your physician will also never tell you that at one time strokes,
> both ischemic and hemorrhagic, heart failure due to neuropathy as
> well as both ischemic and hemorrhagic coronary events, obesity,
> atherosclerosis, elevated blood pressure, elevated cholesterol,
> elevated triglycerides, impotence, retinopathy, renal failure, liver
> failure, polycystic ovary syndrome, elevated blood sugar, systemic
> candida, impaired carbohydrate metabolism, poor wound healing,
> impaired fat metabolism, peripheral neuropathy as well as many more
> of today's disgraceful epidemic disorders were once well understood
> to often be but symptoms of diabetes.
>
> If you contract diabetes and depend upon orthodox medical treatment,
> sooner or later you will experience one or more of its symptoms as
> the disease rapidly worsens. It is now common practice to refer to
> these symptoms as if they were separable independent diseases with
> separate unrelated proprietary treatments provided by competing
> medical specialists.
>
> It is true that many of these symptoms can and sometimes do result
> from other causes; however, it is also true that this fact has been
> used to disguise the causative role of diabetes and to justify
> expensive, ineffective treatments for these symptoms.
>
> Epidemic Type II Diabetes is curable. By the time you get to the end
> of this article you are going to know that. You're going to know why
> it isn't routinely being cured. And, you're going to know how to
> cure it. You are also probably going to be angry at what a handful
> of greedy people have surreptitiously done to the entire orthodox
> medical community and to its trusting patients.
>
> The diabetes industry
>
> Today's diabetes industry is a massive community that has grown step
> by step from its dubious origins in the early twentieth century. In
> the last eighty years it has become enormously successful at
> shutting out competitive voice that attempt to point out the fraud
> involved in modern diabetes treatment.
>
> It has matured into a religion. And, like all religions, it depends
> heavily upon the faith of the believer. So successful has it become
> that it verges on blasphemy to suggest that, in most cases, the
> kindly high priest with the stethoscope draped prominently around
> his neck is a charlatan and a fraud.
>
> In the large majority of cases he has never cured a single case of
> diabetes in his entire medical career.
>
> The financial and political influence of this medical community has
> almost totally subverted the original intent of our regulatory
> agencies. They routinely approve death dealing ineffective drugs
> with insufficient testing.
>
> Former commissioner of the FDA, Dr. Herbert Ley, in testimony before
> a US Senate hearing, commented "People think the FDA is protecting
> them. It isn't. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks its
> doing are as different as night and day."[2]
>
> The financial and political influence of this medical community
> dominates our entire medical insurance industry. Although this is
> beginning to change, in America, it is still difficult to find
> employer group medical insurance to cover effective alternative
> medical treatments.
>
> Orthodox coverage is standard in all states. Alternative medicine is
> not. For example there are only 1400 licensed naturopaths in 11
> states compared to over 3.4 million orthodox licensees in 50 states.
> [3] Generally, only approved treatments from licensed credentialed
> practitioners are insurable.
>
> This, in effect, neatly creates a special kind of money that can only
> be spent within the orthodox medical and drug industry.
>
> No other industry in the world has been able to manage the politics
> of convincing people to accept so large a part of their pay in a form
> that does not allow them to spend it on health care as they see fit.
> Insurance money can only be spent within an industry that has banned
> the cure word from its vocabulary.
>
> The financial and political influence of this medical community
> completely controls virtually every diabetes publication in the
> country. Many diabetes publications are subsidized by ads for
> diabetes supplies. No diabetes editor is going to allow the truth to
> be printed in his magazine.
>
> This is why the diabetic only pays about 1/4 to 1/3 of the cost of
> printing the magazine he depends upon for accurate information. The
> rest is subsidized by ads purchased by diabetes manufacturers with a
> vested commercial interest in preventing diabetics from curing their
> diabetes. When looking for a magazine that tells the truth about
> diabetes, look first to see if it is full of ads for diabetes
> supplies.
>
> And then there are the various associations that solicit annual
> donations to find a cure for their proprietary disease. Every year
> they promise a cure is just around the corner; just send more money.
> Some of these very same associations have been clearly implicated in
> providing advice that promotes the progress of diabetes in their
> trusting supporters.
>
> For example, for years they heavily promoted exchange diets [4] which
> are in fact scientifically worthless, as anyone who has ever tried to
> use them quickly finds out. They have ridiculed the use of glycemic
> tables which are actually very helpful to the diabetic.
>
> They promoted the use of margarine as heart healthy long after it
> was well understood that margarine causes diabetes and promotes
> heart failure. [5] Why everyone expects that these tax free
> associations will really self destruct by eliminating their
> proprietary disease and thereby destroy their only source of income
> is truly amazing.
>
> If people ever wake up to the cure for diabetes that has been
> suppressed for forty years, these associations will soon be out of
> business. But until then, they nonetheless continue to need our
> support.
>
> For forty years medical research has consistently shown, with
> increasing clarity, that type II diabetes is a degenerative disease
> directly caused by an engineered food supply that is focused on
> profit instead of health. Although the diligent can readily glean
> this information from a wealth of medical research literature, it is
> generally otherwise unavailable.
>
> Certainly this information has been, and remains, largely unavailable
> in the medical schools that train our retail doctors.
>
> Prominent among the causative agents in our modern diabetes epidemic
> are the engineered fats and oils sold in today's supermarkets.
>
> The first step to curing diabetes is to stop believing the lie that
> the disease is incurable.
>
> Diabetes history
>
> In 1922, three Canadian Nobel prize winners, Banting, Best and
> Macleod were successful in saving the life of a fourteen year old
> diabetic girl in Toronto General Hospital with injectable insulin.
> [6] Eli Lilly was licensed to manufacture this new wonder drug and
> the medical community basked in the glory of a job well done.
>
> It wasn't until 1933 that rumors about a new rogue diabetes
> surfaced. This was in a paper presented by Joslyn, Dublin and Marks
> and printed in the American Journal of Medical Sciences. This
> paper "Studies on Diabetes Mellitus" [7], discussed the emergence of
> a major US epidemic of a disease which looked very much like the
> diabetes of the early 1920's only it did not respond to the wonder
> drug, insulin. Even worse, sometimes insulin treatment killed the
> patient.
>
> This new disease became known as Insulin Resistant Diabetes because
> it had the elevated blood sugar symptom of diabetes, but responded
> poorly to insulin therapy.
>
> Many physicians had considerable success in treatment of this disease
> by diet. A great deal was learned about the relationship between
> diet and diabetes in the 1930's and 1940's.
>
> Diabetes, which had a per capita incidence of 0.0028% at the turn of
> the century, had by 1933, zoomed 1000% in the US to become a disease
> faced by many doctors [8]. This disease, under a variety of aliases,
> was destined to go on to wreck the health of over half of the
> American population and to incapacitate almost 20% by the 1990's. [9]
>
> In 1950 the medical community became able to perform serum insulin
> assays.
>
> This quickly revealed that the disease wasn't classical diabetes.
> This new disease was characterized by sufficient, often excessive,
> blood insulin levels.
>
> The problem was that the insulin was ineffective; it did not reduce
> blood sugar.
>
> But, since the disease had been known as diabetes for almost twenty
> years it was renamed Type II Diabetes. This was to distinguish it
> from the earlier Type 1 Diabetes which was due to insufficient
> insulin production by the pancreas.
>
> Had the dietary insights of the previous 20 years dominated the
> medical scene from this point and into the late 1960's, diabetes
> would have become widely recognized as curable instead of merely
> treatable. Unfortunately this didn't happen and so, in 1950, a
> search was launched for another wonder drug to deal with the Type II
> Diabetes problem.
>
> Cure vs treatment
>
> This new ideal wonder drug would be, like insulin, effective in
> remitting obvious adverse symptoms of the disease, but not effective
> in curing the underlying disease. Thus, it would be needed
> continually for the remaining life of the patient. It would have to
> be patentable; that is, it could not be a natural medication because
> these are non-patentable.
>
> Like insulin, it would be highly profitable to manufacture and
> distribute. Mandatory government approvals would be required to
> stimulate the use by physicians as a prescription drug. Testing
> required for these approvals would have to be enormously expensive to
> prevent other, unapproved, medications from becoming competitive.
>
> This is the origin of the classic medical protocol of "treating the
> symptoms".
>
> By doing this, both the drug company and the doctor could prosper in
> business and the patient, while not being cured of his disease, was
> sometimes temporarily relieved of some of his symptoms.
>
> Additionally, natural medications that actually cured disease, would
> have to be suppressed. The more effective they were, the more they
> would need to be suppressed and their proponents jailed as quacks.
> After all, it wouldn't do to have some cheap effective natural
> medication cure disease in a capital intensive monopoly market
> specifically designed to treat symptoms without curing disease.
>
> Often the natural substance really did cure disease. This is why the
> force of law was used to drive the natural, often superior,
> medicines from the market place, to remove the cure word from the
> medical vocabulary and to totally undermine the very concept of a
> free marketplace in the medical business.
>
> Now it is clear why the cure word is so vigorously suppressed by law.
> The FDA has extensive Orwellian regulations that prohibit the use of
> the cure word to describe any competing medicine or natural
> substance. It is precisely because many natural substances do
> actually both cure and prevent disease that this word has become so
> frightening to the drug and orthodox medical community.
>
> The commercial value of symptoms
>
> After this redesign of drug development policy to focus on
> ameliorating symptoms rather than curing disease, it became
> necessary to reinvent the way drugs were marketed. This was done in
> 1949 in the midst of a major epidemic of insulin resistant diabetes.
>
> In 1949, the US medical community reclassified the symptoms of
> diabetes, [10] along with many other disease symptoms, into diseases
> in their own right.
>
> With this reclassification as the new basis for diagnosis, competing
> medical specialty groups quickly seized upon related groups of
> symptoms as their own proprietary symptom set. Thus the heart
> specialist, endocrinologist, allergist, kidney specialist, and many
> others started to treat the symptoms for which they felt
> responsible.
>
> As the underlying cause of the disease was widely ignored, all focus
> on actually curing anything was completely lost. By this new focus on
> treating symptoms, instead of curing disease, disease was now allowed
> to run rampant without any effective check on its progress.
>
> While not a very smart idea from the patients viewpoint, it did
> succeed in making the American medical community amongst the
> wealthiest in the world because of the continuing high volume of
> repeat business that it promoted Heart failure for example, which
> had previously been understood to often be but a symptom of
> diabetes, now became a disease not directly connected to diabetes.
>
> It became fashionable to think that diabetes "increased cardio-
> vascular risk." The causal role of a failed blood sugar control
> system in heart failure became obscured. Consistent with the new
> medical paradigm, none of the treatments offered by the heart
> specialist actually cures, or is even intended to cure, their
> proprietary disease.
>
> For example, the three year survival rate for bypass surgery is
> almost exactly the same as if no surgery was undertaken. [11]
>
> Today over half of the people in America suffer from one or more
> symptoms of this disease. In its beginnings, it has become well known
> to physicians as Type II Diabetes, Insulin Resistant Diabetes,
> Insulin Resistance, Adult Onset Diabetes, or more rarely
> Hyperinsulinemia. According to the American Heart Association,
> almost 50% of Americans suffer from one or more symptoms of this
> disease.
>
> One third of our population is morbidly obese. Half of our
> population is overweight. Type II Diabetes, also called Adult Onset
> Diabetes, now appears routinely in six year old children.
>
> Many of our degenerative diseases can be traced to a massive failure
> of our endocrine system that was well known to the physicians of the
> 1930's as Insulin Resistant Diabetes. This basic underlying disorder
> is known to be a derangement of the blood sugar control system by
> badly engineered fats and oils.
>
> It is exacerbated and complicated by the widespread lack of other
> essential nutrition that the body needs to cope with the metabolic
> consequences of these poisons.
>
> All fats and oils are not equal. Some are healthy and beneficial;
> many, commonly available in the supermarket, are poisonous. The
> health distinction is not between saturated and unsaturated, as the
> fats and oils industry would have us believe. Many saturated oils
> and fats are highly beneficial; many unsaturated oils are highly
> poisonous. The important health distinction is between natural and
> engineered.
>
> There exists great dishonesty in advertising in the fats and oils
> industry. It is aimed at creating a market for cheap junk oils such
> as soy, cottonseed and rape seed oil. With an informed and aware
> public these oils would have no market at all and the US, and indeed
> the world, would have far less diabetes.
>
> Epidemiological Life style link
>
> As early as 1901, efforts had been made to manufacture and sell food
> products by the use of automated factory machinery because of the
> immense potential profits that were possible. Most of the early
> efforts failed because people were inherently suspicious of food that
> wasn't farm fresh and because the technology was poor.
>
> As long as people were prosperous, suspicious food products made
> little headway. Crisco, [12] the artificial shortening, was once
> given away free in 2 1/2 lb cans in an unsuccessful effort to
> influence the US wives to trust and buy the product in preference to
> lard.
>
> Margarine was introduced and was bitterly opposed by the dairy
> states. With the advent of the depression of the 1930's, margarine,
> Crisco and a host of other refined and hydrogenated products began
> to make significant penetration into the US food markets. Support
> for dairy opposition to margarine faded during WW II because there
> wasn't enough butter for both the civilian population and the needs
> of the military. [13] At this point, the dairy industry having lost
> much support, simply accepted a diluted market share and
> concentrated onsupplying the military.
>
> Flax oils and fish oils, which were common in the stores and
> considered a dietary staple before the American population became
> diseased, have disappeared from the shelf. The last supplier of flax
> oil to the major distribution chains was Archer Daniel's Midland and
> they stopped producing and supplying theproduct in 1950.
>
> More recently, one of the most important of the remaining genuinely
> beneficial fats was subjected to a massive media disinformation
> campaign that portrayed it as a saturated fat that causes heart
> failure. As a result, it has virtually disappeared from the
> supermarket shelves.
>
> Thus was coconut oil removed from the food chain and replaced with
> soy oil, cottonseed oil and rape seed oil. [14] Our parents would
> never have swapped a fine healthy oil like coconut oil for these
> cheap junk oils. It was shortly after this successful media blitz
> that the US populace lost its war on fat.
>
> For many years coconut oil had been one of our most effective dietary
> weight control agents.
>
> The history of the engineered adulteration of our once clean food
> supply exactly parallels the rise of the epidemic of diabetes and
> hyperinsulinemia now sweeping the US as well as much of the rest of
> the world.
>
> The second step to a cure for this disease epidemic is to stop
> believing the lie that our food supply is safe and nutritious.
>
> Nature of the disease
>
> Diabetes is classically diagnosed as a failure of the body to
> properly metabolize carbohydrates. Its defining symptom is a high
> blood glucose level. Type 1 Diabetes results from insufficient
> insulin production by the pancreas. Type 2 Diabetes results from
> ineffective insulin. In both types, the blood glucose level remains
> elevated. Neither insufficient insulin nor ineffective insulin can
> limit post prandial (after eating) blood sugar to the normal range.
>
> In established cases of Type 2 Diabetes, these elevated blood sugar
> levels are often preceded by and accompanied by chronically elevated
> insulin levels and by serious distortions of other endocrine hormonal
> markers.
>
> The ineffective insulin is no different from effective insulin. Its
> ineffectiveness lies in the failure of our cell population to respond
> to it. It is not the result of any biochemical defect in the insulin
> itself. Therefore, it is appropriate to note that this disease is a
> disease that affects almost every cell in the seventy trillion or so
> cells of our body. All of these cells are dependent upon the food
> that we eat for the raw materials that they need for self repair and
> maintenance.
>
> The classification of diabetes as a failure to metabolize
> carbohydrates is a traditional classification that originated in the
> early 19th century when little was known about metabolic diseases or
> about metabolic processes. [15]
>
> Today, with our increased knowledge of metabolic processes, it would
> appear quite appropriate to define Type 2 Diabetes more fundamentally
> as a failure of the body to properly metabolize fats and oils. This
> failure results in a loss of effectiveness of insulin and in the
> consequent failure to metabolize carbohydrates. Unfortunately, much
> medical insight into this matter, except at the research level,
> remains hampered by its 19th century legacy.
>
> Thus Type II Diabetes and its early hyperinsulinemic symptoms are
> whole body symptoms of this basic cellular failure to properly
> metabolize glucose.
>
> Each cell of our body, for reasons which are becoming clearer, find
> themselves unable to transport glucose from the blood stream to their
> interior. The glucose then either remains in the blood stream, is
> stored as body fat or as glycogen, or is otherwise disposed of in
> urine.
>
> It appears that when insulin binds to a cell membrane receptor, it
> initiates a complex cascade of biochemical reactions inside the
> cell. This causes a class of glucose transporters known as GLUT 4
> molecules to leave their parking area inside the cell and travel to
> the inside surface of the plasma cell membrane.
>
> When in the membrane, they migrate to special areas of the membrane
> called caveolae areas. [16] There, by another series of biochemical
> reactions, they identify and hook up with glucose molecules and
> transport them into the interior of the cell by a process called
> endocytosis. Within the cells interior, this glucose is then burned
> as fuel by the mitochondria to produce energy to powercellular
> activity.
>
> Thus these GLUT 4 transporters lower glucose in the blood stream by
> transporting it out of the bloodstream into all of our bodily cells.
>
> Many of the molecules involved in these glucose and insulin mediated
> pathways are lipids, that is they are fatty acids. A healthy plasma
> cell membrane, now known to be an active player in the glucose
> scenario, contains a complement of cis type w=3 unsaturated fatty
> acids. [17] This makes the membrane relatively fluid and slippery.
> When these cis fatty acids are chronically unavailable because of our
> diet, trans fatty acids and short and medium chain saturated fatty
> acids are substituted in the cell membrane.
>
> These substitutions make the cellular membrane stiffer and more
> sticky and inhibit the glucose transport mechanism. [18]
>
> Thus, in the absence of sufficient cis omega 3 fatty acids in our
> diet, these fatty acid substitutions take place, the mobility of the
> GLUT 4 transporters is diminished, the interior biochemistry of the
> cell is changed and glucose remains elevated in the bloodstream.
>
> Elsewhere in the body, the pancreas secretes excess insulin, the
> liver manufactures fat from the excess sugar, the adipose cells
> store excess fat, the body goes into a high urinary mode,
> insufficient cellular energy is available for bodily activity and
> the entire endocrine system becomes distorted. Eventually pancreatic
> failure occurs, body weight plummets and a diabetic crisis is
> precipitated.
>
> Although there remains much work to be done to fully elucidate all
> of the steps in all of these pathways, this clearly marks the
> beginning of a biochemical explanation for the known epidemiological
> relationship between cheap engineered dietary fats and oils and the
> onset of Type 2 Diabetes.
>
> Orthodox medical treatment
>
> After the diagnosis of diabetes, modern orthodox medical treatment
> consists of either oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin.
>
> n 1955, oral hypoglycemic drugs were introduced. Currently available
> oral hypoglycemic agents fall into five classifications according to
> their biophysical mode of action.[19] These classes are:
>
> Biguanides Glucosidase inhibitors Meglitinides Sulfonylureas
> Thiazolidinediones
>
> The biguanides lower blood sugar in three ways. They inhibit the
> normal release, by the liver, of its glucose stores, they interfere
> with intestinal absorption of glucose from ingested carbohydrates
> and they are said to increase peripheral uptake of glucose.
>
> The glucosidase inhibitors are designed to inhibit the amylase
> enzymes produced by our pancreas and which are essential to the
> digestion of carbohydrates.
>
> The theory is that if the digestion of carbohydrates is inhibited the
> blood sugar cannot be elevated.
>
> The meglitinides are designed to stimulate the pancreas to produce
> insulin in a patient that likely already has an elevated level of
> insulin in their bloodstream. Only rarely does the doctor even
> measure insulin levels. This drug is frequently prescribed without
> any knowledge of preexisting insulin levels.
>
> The fact that elevated insulin levels are almost as damaging as
> elevated glucose levels is widely ignored.
>
> The sulfonylureas are another pancreatic stimulant class designed to
> stimulate the production of insulin. Serum insulin determinations are
> rarely made by the doctor before prescribing this drug. This drug is
> often prescribed for type II diabetics, many of whom already have
> elevated ineffective insulin.
>
> These drugs are notorious for causing hypoglycemia as a side effect.
> The thiazolidinediones are famous for causing liver cancer. One of
> them, Rezulin, was approved in the USA through devious political
> infighting but failed to get approval in England because it was
> known to cause liver cancer.
>
> The first doctor that had responsibility to approve it at the FDA
> refused to do so. It was only after he was replaced by a more
> compliant official that Rezulin gained approval by the FDA. It went
> on to kill well over 100 diabetes patients and cripple many others
> before the fight to get it off the market was finally won.
>
> Rezulin was designed to stimulate the uptake of glucose from the
> bloodstream by the peripheral cells and to inhibit the normal
> secretion of glucose by the liver. The politics of why this drug ever
> came to market and then remained in the market for such an
> unexplainable length of time with regulatory agency approval is not
> clear. [20] As of April 2000 law suits commenced to clarify this
> situation [21]
>
> Today insulin is prescribed for both the Type I and Type II
> diabetics. Injectable insulin substitutes for the insulin that the
> body no longer produces.
>
> Of course, this treatment, while necessary to preserving life for the
> Type I diabetic, is highly questionable when applied to the Type II
> diabetic. It is important to note that neither insulin nor any of
> these oral hypoglycemic agents exert any curative action whatsoever
> on any type of diabetes.
>
> None of these medical strategies are designed to normalize the
> cellular uptake of glucose by the cells that need it to power their
> activity. The prognosis with this orthodox treatment is increasing
> disability and early death from heart or kidney failure or the
> failure of some other vital organ.
>
> The third step to a cure for this disease is to become informed and
> to apply an alternative methodology that is soundly based upon good
> science.
>
> Alternative medical treatment
>
> Effective alternative treatment that directly leads to a cure is
> available today for some Type I and for many Type II diabetics.
> About 5% of the diabetic population suffers from Type I diabetes;
> the remaining 95% suffer from Type II diabetes.[22] Gestational
> diabetes is simply ordinary diabetes contracted by a woman who is
> pregnant.
>
> For the Type I diabetic an alternative methodology for the treatment
> of Type I Diabetes was the subject of intensive research in the
> early 1990's with several papers presented in the scientific
> journals.
>
> This was done in modern hospitals in Madras, India and subjected to
> rigorous double-blind studies to prove its efficacy.[23] The protocol
> operated to restore normal pancreatic beta cell function so the
> pancreas could again produce insulin as it should.
>
> This approach was, apparently, demonstrated to be capable of
> restoring pancreatic beta cell function where it had been lost. A
> major complication lies in whether the antigens that originally led
> to the autoimmune destruction of these beta cells have disappeared
> from or remain in the body. If they remain, a cure is less likely;
> if they have disappeared, the cure is more likely.
>
> This early work in Madras India has been continued in a number of
> laboratories throughout the world and much of it has been published
> in scientific journals.
>
> If a patent search is conducted to discover research work done on
> type I diabetes that never seems to make it to the marketplace, a
> number of patents on herbal remedies will be found. These patents
> typically make strong claims about the regeneration of pancreatic
> beta cells and the restoring of them to normal function. In
> particular, patent number 5,886,029 entitled "Method and composition
> for treatment of diabetes" claims to restore pancreatic beta cell
> function by regenerating the pancreatic beta cells.
>
> This particular patent states in part:
>
> The unique combination of components in the medicinal composition
> leads to a regeneration of the pancreas cells which then start
> producing insulin on their own. Since the composition restores normal
> pancreatic function, treatment can be discontinued after between four
> and twelve months.
>
> For reasons which, while understandable, are not at all acceptable,
> this promising line of research never matured and today can be found
> only in the archives of a few obscure scientific journals and in the
> patent office. Since absolutely no financial incentive exists to
> cure type I diabetes, this methodology is not likely to reappear any
> time soon and certainly not in the American orthodox medical
> community.
>
> The goal of any effective alternative program is to repair and
> restore the body's own blood sugar control mechanism. It is the
> malfunctioning of this mechanism that, over time, directly causes
> all of the many debilitating symptoms that make orthodox treatment
> so financially rewarding for the diabetes industry.
>
> For Type II Diabetes, the steps in the program are: [24]
> Repair the faulty blood sugar control system. This is done simply by
> substituting clean healthy beneficial fats and oils in the diet for
> the pristine looking but toxic trans-isomer mix found in attractive
> plastic containers on room temperature supermarket shelves.
>
> Consume only flax oil, fish oil and occasionally cod liver oil until
> blood sugar starts to stabilize. Then add back healthy oils such as
> butter, coconut oil, olive oil and clean animal fat. Read labels;
> refuse to consume cheap junk oils when they appear in processed food
> or on restaurant menus. Diabetics are chronically short of vitamins
> and minerals; they need to add a good quality broad spectrum
> supplement to the diet.
>
> Control blood sugar manually during the recovery cycle. Under medical
> supervision, gradually discontinue all oral hypoglycemic agents along
> with any additional drugs given to counteract their side effects.
> Develop natural blood sugar control by the use of glycaemic tables,
> by consuming frequent small meals, by the use of fiber, by regular
> post prandial exercise, and by a complete avoidance of all sugars
> along with the judicious use of only non-toxic sweeteners [25]. Avoid
> alcohol until blood sugar stabilizes in the normal range.
>
> Avoid caffeine as well as other stimulants; they tend to trigger
> sugar release by the liver. Keep score by using a pin prick type
> glucose meter. Keep track of everything you do with a medical diary.
>
> Restore a proper balance of healthy fats and oils when the blood
> sugar controller again works.
>
> Permanently remove from the diet all cheap toxic junk fats and oils
> and the processed and restaurant foods that contain them. When the
> blood sugar controller again starts to work correctly, gradually
> introduce additional healthy foods to the diet. Test the effect of
> these added foods by monitoring blood sugar levels with the pin
> prick type blood sugar monitor. Be sure to include the results of
> these tests in your diary also.
>
> Continue the program until normal insulin values are also restored
> after blood sugar levels begin to stabilize in the normal region.
> Once blood sugar levels fall into the normal range the pancreas will
> gradually stop over producing insulin.
>
> This process will typically take a little longer and can be tested by
> having your physician send a sample of your blood to a lab for a
> serum insulin determination. A good idea is to wait a couple of
> months after blood sugar control is restored and then have your
> physician check your insulin level. It's nice to have blood sugar in
> the normal range; it's even nicer to have this accomplished without
> excess insulin in the bloodstream.
>
> Separately repair the collateral damage done by the disease. Vascular
> problems caused by a chronically elevated glucose level will normally
> reverse themselves without conscious effort. The effects of
> retinopathy and of peripheral neuropathy, for example, will usually
> self repair. However when the fine capillaries in the basement
> membranes of the kidneys begin to leak due to chronic high blood
> glucose, the kidneys compensate by laying down scar tissue to prevent
> the leakage. This scar tissue remains even after the diabetes is
> cured and is the reason why the kidney damage is not believed to
> self repair.
>
> A word of warning: when retinopathy develops a temptation will exist
> to have the damage repaired by laser surgery. This laser technique
> stops the retinal bleeding by creating scar tissue where the leaks
> have developed. This scar tissue will prevent normal healing of the
> fine capillaries in the eye when the diabetes is reversed. By
> reversing the diabetes instead of opting for laser surgery, there is
> an excellent chance that the eye will heal completely.
>
> However if laser surgery is done, this healing will always be
> complicated by the scar tissue left by the laser.
>
> The arterial and vascular damage done by years of elevated sugar and
> insulin and by the proliferation of systemic candida will slowly
> reverse due to improved diet. However, it takes many years to clean
> out the arteries by this form of oral chelation. Arterial damage can
> be reversed much more quickly by using intravenous chelation [26]
> therapy.
>
> What would normally take many years through diet alone, can often be
> done in six months with intravenous therapy. This is reputed to be
> effective over 80% of the time. For obvious reasons, don't expect
> your doctor to approve of this, particularly if he is a heart
> specialist.
>
> The prognosis is usually swift recovery from the disease and
> restoration of normal health and energy levels in a few months to a
> year or more. The length of time that it takes to effect a cure
> depends upon how long the disease was allowed to develop.
>
> For those who quickly work to reverse the disease after early
> discovery, the time is usually a few months or less. For those who
> have had the disease for many years, this recovery time may lengthen
> to a year or more.
>
> Thus, there is good reason to get busy reversing this disease as soon
> as it becomes clearly identified.
>
> By the time you get to this point in this article, and, if we've done
> a good job of explaining our diabetes epidemic, you should know what
> causes it, what orthodox medical treatment is all about and why
> diabetes has become a disgrace both in the US and world wide. Of
> even greater importance, you have become acquainted with a self help
> program that has demonstrated great potential to actually cure this
> disease.
> _____
> Thomas Smith is a reluctant medical investigator having been forced
> into curing his own diabetes because it was obvious that his doctor
> would not or could not not cure it. He has published the results of
> his successful diabetes investigation in his self help manual
> entitled "Insulin: Our Silent Killer" written for the layman but
> also widely valued by the medical practitioner.
>
>
> He has also posted a great deal of useful information about this
> disease on his web page at: www.Healingmatters.com.
>
> 1 "Fast Stats" National Center for Health Statistics",
> eaths/Mortality Preliminary 2001 data
>
> 2 In response to a question from Senator Edward Long about the FDA
> during US Senate hearings in 1965.
>
> 3 David M. Eisenberg MD, "Credentialing complementary and alternative
> medical providers", Annals of Internal Medicine, Dec 17, 2002 Vol137
> No. 12 p 968
>
> 4 The American Diabetes Association and The American Dietetic
> Association, "The Official pocket guide to diabetic exchanges",
> Newly updated; March 1, 1998 McGraw-Hill/Contemporary Distributed
> Products.
>
> 5 "How do I follow a Healthy diet" American Heart Association
> National Center, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, Texas. 75231-4596
> americanheart.org
>
> 6 JAC Brown., M.B., B., Chir., "Pears medical encyclopedia,
> Illustrated", 2071, p-250
>
> 7 Joslyn E.P., Dublin L.I., Marks H.H., "Studies on Diabetes
> Mellitus", 1933 American Journal of Medical sciences, 186:753-773
>
> 8 Encyclopedia Americana, Library Edition 1966 "Diabetes Mellitus",
> Vol 9, pp 54-56
>
> 9 American Heart Association, "Stroke (Brain Attack), Aug 28, 1998
> www.amhrt.org/ScientificHStats98/05stroke.html American Heart
> Association, "Cardiovascular Disease Statistics" Aug 28, 1998
> www.amhrt.org/Heart_and_Stroke_A_Z_Guide/cvds.html "Statistics
> related to overweight and obesity",
>
> http://www.niddk.nih.gov/health/nutrit/pubs/statobes.htm
> http://www.winltdusa.com/about/infocenter/healthnews/articles/obesest
> ats.htm
>
> 10 Ibid "Diabetes Mellitus" pp 54-55
>
> 11 The veterans administration Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
> Cooperative Study Group, "Eleven year survival in the Veterans
> Administration randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery for
> stable angina" Veterans Administration co-operative study, New Eng.
> J Med 1984 311: 1333-1339 Coronary Artery Surgery Study, CASS "A
> randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery: quality of life
> in patients randomly assigned to treatment groups" Circulation 68
> No. 5 1983 :951-960
>
> 12 Trager J., "The Food Chronology", 1995, Henry Holt & Company.
> N.Y., N.Y. Items listed by date.
>
> 13 "Margarine", Encyclopedia Americana, Library Edition, 1966, pp
> 279-280
>
> 14 Sally Fallon, MA; Mary C. Enig, PhD, Patricia onnolly; "Nourishing
> Traditions"; Promotion Publishing, 1995 Mary C Enig PhD, F.A.C.N.,
> "Coconut: In support of Good Health in the 21st Century"; www.live
> coconutoil.com/maryenig.htm
>
> 15 Bernardo A Houssay MD, et al; "Human Physiology", McGraw-Hill Book
> Company 1955 pp 400-421
>
> 16 Gustavson J, et al; "Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake involves
> the transition of glucose transporters to a caveolae-rich fraction
> within the plasma cell membrane: implications for type II diabetes."
> MolMed May 1996, 2(3):367-372
>
> 17 F Ganong MD, "Review of Medical Physiology" 19th edition William,
> 1999, p-9; pp 26-33 18 Pan D A, et al; "Skeletal muscle membrane
> lipid composition is related to adiposity and insulin action", J
> Clin Invest, 1995 Dec;96(6): 2802-2808 19 Physicians Desk Reference,
> 53rd Edition, 1999
>
> 20 Thomas Smith, "Insulin: Our Silent Killer", Rev. 2nd Ed. July,
> 2000 p20 Thomas Smith, PO Box 7685 Loveland Colorado, 80537, Tel: 1
> (970) 669-9176 His website: http://www.healingmatters.com
>
> 21 Law Officies of Charles H Johnson & Associates. Toll free: 1 (800)
> 535-5727
>
> 22 "Diabetes Mellitus Statistics", American Heart Association,
> www.amhrt.org
>
> 23 Shanmugasundaram E.R.B., et al, @ Dr. Ambedkar Institute of
> Diabetes, (Kilpauk Medical College Hospital), Madras. "Possible
> regeneration of the Islets of Langerhans in Streptozotocin-diabetic
> rats given Gymnema sylvestre leaf extractsd", J. Ethnopharmacology
> 1990;30:265-279 Shanmugasundaram E.R.B., et al, "Use of Gemnema
> sylvestre leaf extract in the control of blood glucose in insulin
> dependent diabetes mellitus", J. Ethanopharmacology,1990; 30:281-294
>
> 24 Thomas Smith, op. cit pp 97-123
>
> 25 Many popular artificial, sweeteners on sale in the supermarket,
> are extremely poisonus and dangerous to the diabetic; indeed, many
> of them are worse than the sugar the diabetic is trying to avoid.
> see for example: Thomas Smith op. cit. pp 53-58
>
> 26 Dr. Morton Walker, Dr. Hitendra Shah, "Chelation Therapy" 1997,
> Keats Publishing, Inc. 27 Pine Street (Box 876) New Cannan,
> Connecticut 06840-0876 ISBN: 0-87983-730-6
>
> http://www.rense.com/general58/diabetes.htm
>
>

Re: Diabetes curable. (Archive in diabetes.) REFERENCE.

Re: Diabetes curable. (Archive in diabetes.) REFERENCE.

Re: Diabetes curable. (Archive in diabetes.) REFERENCE.

Re: Diabetes curable. (Archive in diabetes.) REFERENCE.

Re: Diabetes curable. (Archive in diabetes.) REFERENCE.

Re: Diabetes curable. (Archive in diabetes.) REFERENCE.

Re: Diabetes curable. (Archive in diabetes.) REFERENCE.

Re: Diabetes curable. (Archive in diabetes.) REFERENCE.

Re: Diabetes curable. (Archive in diabetes.) REFERENCE.

Re: Diabetes curable. (Archive in diabetes.) REFERENCE.