Whole Foods Diet Archives

Private communication: (More information about whole foods from Price-Pottenger Foundation.) Archive in reference.

[ Whole Foods Diet Archive ]
[ Main Archives Page ] [ Glossary/Index ]
[ FAQ ] [ Recommended Books ] [ Bulletin Board ]
   Search this site!
 
        

Private communication: (More information about whole foods from Price-Pottenger Foundation.) Archive in reference.

Posted by Walt Stoll on April 15, 2002 at 06:52:05:

Thanks, Barb.

This is part of the basis for the Price/Pottenger Foundation that I have
been quoting for the past 25 years. It can be reached at
price-pottenger.org Add /books.html and all their publications become
visible.

The Human Genome Project is now demonstrating WHY their empirical
observations were so accurate.

Physicians have no reason to prevent disease since TREATING disease is what
makes the money. Until the allopathic monopoly is broken discoveries like
this will be resisted to the last man and it is the public that suffers and
pays.

You can see that you have pushed one of my buttons.

Love, Dad


----- Original Message -----
From: "Barbara S Davis"
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 9:57 PM
Subject: Rea -- Cats & Cancers


> This essay by Dr. Joel Robbins MD, DC, ND was sent to support this
> morning, and warrants a slot in the best of the web series.
>
> Here's a question I get all the time: "If diet makes a difference in
> our health, why is it that my grandfather, who ate everything wrong,
> lived to be 90 years of age and his great grandson, age
> 2, has cancer?" How can this man, denying every aspect of health,
> live to be 90-95 while his 2-year old great grandchild has cancer? If
> it's diet that makes a difference, it would seem like Grandpa would
> be the one with the trouble.
>
> Back in the 40's there was a dentist by the name of Francis
> Pottenger. Francis Pottenger had that same question. His real
> question was, "What does processed food do to our bodies?" Now he was
> not a nutrition nut, and he financed his own research, so no one told
> him what results to come up with. He used cats (800 cats). He divided
> these cats into five groups. The first two groups he fed unprocessed
> food. Those cats remained healthy throughout the experiment, so let's
> put them aside.
>
> It's the other three groups we're interested in. He fed them
> processed foods (junk foods in other words) and here's what he
> found. The first generation junk-food cats developed diseases much
> like we humans acquire-arthritis, cancers, diabetes, allergies, and
> so forth. They got these diseases toward the end of their life span.
>
> The second-generation junk-food cats developed those same diseases in
> the middles of their lifespan.
>
> The third generation junk-food cats developed those diseases at the
> beginning of their lifespan. There was no fourth generation. Either
> the third generation parents could not conceive, or if they
> did,they aborted.
>
> Applying Cat "Scans" to People... Right now in America, 25% of young
> adults cannot conceive. It's the worst we've ever seen. The incidents
> of spontaneous abortion or miscarriage are on the rise. It's the
> worst this country has ever seen. The Number One disease killer of
> children under the age of ten in this country is a chronic
> degenerative disease. It's cancer.
>
> What has happened? Well, since 1900 our diet in this country has
> degenerated terribly. In those days Americans ate whole foods-
> because then we didn't have any choice. We grew off the land. We
> didn't know about enzymes; we didn't know about canning; we didn't
> know about preservatives or refrigeration or so forth, so basically
> we had to live off the land.
>
> So we've gone from that to processed foods and preserved foods grown
> on depleted soils. It is now seven to fourteen days before the
> average American will consume anything raw. Now we're three or four
> generations from 1900, and we're seeing the problems Pottenger saw
> with his cats.
>
> (In addition, we have an increasing exposure to chemicals in and on
> the food, as well as in our homes, from the fabrics in carpets,
> clothing, pillows, etc, to the cleaning supplies, personal care items
> and lotions, and also the petroleum products in and outside the home.)
>
> Children under the age of ten die of heart attacks and heart disease.
> And diabetes, a relatively new disease for children, is becoming more
> and more common.
>
> Dietary Breakdown... It's the result of our diet breaking down over
> this time. Very few diseases do we actually inherit. What we do
> inherit from our parents is genetically weak tissue, so if Dad smoked
> and didn't have a lung problem prior to conceiving his son, his son
> will be handed genetically weak lung tissue. That's not a disease.
> Those lungs will function normally-except if he violates his body.
> That's the weak link. That's what's going to fall apart, and his son
> can develop some lung problems.
>
> Just this past week a mother called, and she said, "A year ago my
> daughter, age 35, came down with Type II diabetes." I said," I bet
> you just found out you had it too." She said, "How did you know?" You
> see, the daughter acquired it before it showed up in the mother
> because she was the next generation. The weaknesses are even weaker.
> It took less wrong-doing for the problem to manifest. It only took 35
> years of wrong-doing in the daughter, but it took 55 years in the
> mother for it to manifest. Scripture says that the iniquities of the
> fathers are visited to the third and fourth generations. It doesn't
> seem fair, but God isn't fair. He's just, but He's not fair. And one
> day,as C. S. Lewis said, "The first two words out of our mouths when
> we get to heaven will be..'Of course.'" It all makes sense, but it
> doesn't seem fair that we pass on our wrongs, our propensities, our
> weaknesses. Consequently, we have a responsibility. We are in an age
> that lives for the moment-"if it doesn't hurt me now it must be okay."
>
> Three Generations can Reverse the Genetic Code...We have to think in
> terms of our children and our grandchildren. You see, Pottenger found
> that he could reverse the problems, but it took three generations to
> reverse the genetic code. (The cats really did recover!)
>
> What determines a child's health? Number one is the health of the
> parents at conception. As they conceive, what is their health? What
> makes up that first cell's life? Sperm and egg. They are an offspring
> (so to speak) of the mother's body and the father's body. If the
> father's body is deficient and toxic, so it the sperm. It is the
> same with the egg. Right there at conception we can have the first
> cell of life that is deficient and toxic-and that will influence the
> genetic code.
>
> Number two involves the health of the mother while carrying the
> child. What is her health picture? We learned this from Pottenger's
> cats. The thought always was that the mother's body will sacrifice
> itself for the baby. If the mother is not eating well, her body will
> fall apart to make sure there's a healthy baby-and to some degree
> that happens. But what did Pottenger find? That the mothers of the
> third generation, if they couldn't carry to full term, would abort.
> Mother got top billing. So if mother has health problems she'll get
> what nutrition does come in, and this will affect the health of that
> child.
>
> For Number three we need to consider what the mother eats when she
> carries the child. What do we think makes the baby? It's the food. If
> she's eating junk food, she's going to make a junk baby.
>
> Number four. The mother's diet when she's nursing the child. What
> makes the milk? About a week after my wife delivered our fourth child
> it was her birthday, and I asked her what she wanted to do. She
> said, "I haven't had Chinese food for awhile, let's get Chinese." I
> said, "It's your birthday. Let's go get sick together." So off we
> went and had Chinese. For the next 24 hours this poor little baby had
> diarrhea and vomiting. What goes into the mother's mouth determines
> what's in that milk.
>
> Number five deals with the question, what do you feed the child after
> it's been weaned? If you don't feed the child properly after weaning,
> then you start the process downhill. So a good foundation doesn't
> guarantee health.
>
> These are all factors determining the health of a child. Before
> conception the parents should get on the the best possible eating
> program for at least three months, if not a year. This will give that
> baby every opportunity possible. And after conception and birth they
> need to continue to live and eat right too.
>
> Health is built and maintained by eating and living healthily, on a
> continuing and consistent basis.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________



WOW - Excellent Article! What are we doing to our future grandkids?? (nm)

Posted by kmd on April 15, 2002 at 13:39:11:

In Reply to: Private communication: (More information about whole foods from Price-Pottenger Foundation.) Archive in reference. posted by Walt Stoll on April 15, 2002 at 06:52:05:

nm



Re: Private communication: (More information about whole foods from Price-Pottenger Foundation.) Archive in reference.

Posted by Raisa on April 15, 2002 at 16:51:30:

In Reply to: Private communication: (More information about whole foods from Price-Pottenger Foundation.) Archive in reference. posted by Walt Stoll on April 15, 2002 at 06:52:05:

It certainly is alarming! I have been reading about this bit by bit in articles over the years; but this is the first time I have ever realized that an actual study (I realize it was a study of cats, but I thought animals were [or used to be] immune to most human diseases) had been done....and in the '40's ! Raisa

Follow Ups:


Good stuff!

Posted by Artguy on April 15, 2002 at 19:28:25:

In Reply to: Private communication: (More information about whole foods from Price-Pottenger Foundation.) Archive in reference. posted by Walt Stoll on April 15, 2002 at 06:52:05:

I never really thought about health being transferred so directly from parent to child but it makes a lot of sense. Too bad so many "adults" have children way before they learn about stuff like this. Wish this stuff was taught in schools...



Re: Good stuff!

Posted by Walt Stoll on April 16, 2002 at 09:46:50:

In Reply to: Good stuff! posted by Artguy on April 15, 2002 at 19:28:25:

Thanks, Artguy.

Of course you are right!!!!!!!!!!

It is directly against the philosophy of the conventional medical monopoly to do so.

Walt

Follow Ups:


what future grandkids? ;-) nmi

Posted by labrat on April 16, 2002 at 12:27:04:

In Reply to: WOW - Excellent Article! What are we doing to our future grandkids?? (nm) posted by kmd on April 15, 2002 at 13:39:11:

~~~8>

Follow Ups:


Re: Private communication: (More information about whole foods from Price-Pottenger Foundation.) Archive in reference.

Posted by Sonja on April 16, 2002 at 18:04:42:

In Reply to: Private communication: (More information about whole foods from Price-Pottenger Foundation.) Archive in reference. posted by Walt Stoll on April 15, 2002 at 06:52:05:

Thanks for this article, Walt.

I have been thinking along the same lines when reviewing my own history of malnutrition and poor health. I once said to my mother that she should consider herself lucky because there was little or no sugar around when she grew up (in the country). She was quite upset when she realised what she has fed me and what it has contributed to, but I did my best to convince her that none of us will profit from bad conscience.

People tend to live in the 'now', and that is very difficult to change. But we do have the responsibility to next generations, so the facts such as those in the article need to be repeated until more people wake up. I still believe that a lot of people would change, if they had a chance to educate themselves, and if it was presented in a right way. A second, parallell, strategy would be a huge campaign against junk foods. Products should be banned - end of story.

Sonja



Re: Private communication: (More information about whole foods from Price-Pottenger Foundation.) Archive in reference.

Posted by Walt Stoll on April 17, 2002 at 10:49:03:

In Reply to: Re: Private communication: (More information about whole foods from Price-Pottenger Foundation.) Archive in reference. posted by Sonja on April 16, 2002 at 18:04:42:

Thanks, Sonja.

I agree but there are too many powerful special interests that are making billions selling the public on eating junk to protect the masses from it. The only thing I can think to do is for those willing to learn, make the information available and let them protect themselves.

That is what I am trying to do with this website!

Namaste`

Walt

Follow Ups:


[ Whole Foods Diet Archive ]
[ Main Archives Page ] [ Glossary/Index ]
[ FAQ ] [ Recommended Books ] [ Bulletin Board ]
   Search this site!