Cardiac Conditions Archives

Heart Death Or Cell Death?

[ Cardiac Conditions Archive ]
[ Main Archives Page ] [ Glossary/Index ]
[ FAQ ] [ Recommended Books ] [ Bulletin Board ]
   Search this site!
 
        

Heart Death Or Cell Death?

Posted by Ray Tahir [3334.3362] on May 01, 2007 at 18:41:00:

I don't think this is a repost. Anyone read this?




Re: Heart Death Or Cell Death?

Posted by lissa [2032.8] on May 01, 2007 at 18:55:46:

In Reply to: Heart Death Or Cell Death? posted by Ray Tahir [3334.3362] on May 01, 2007 at 18:41:00:

Nope. Haven't seen it before.

very interesting.

Follow Ups:


fascinating

Posted by michele [3355.2969] on May 01, 2007 at 20:01:10:

In Reply to: Heart Death Or Cell Death? posted by Ray Tahir [3334.3362] on May 01, 2007 at 18:41:00:

That article is fascinating. Wow... makes sense...... unreal.

Follow Ups:


Re: Heart Death Or Cell Death?

Posted by Sally [8783.1590] on May 01, 2007 at 21:28:10:

In Reply to: Heart Death Or Cell Death? posted by Ray Tahir [3334.3362] on May 01, 2007 at 18:41:00:

Ray, I don't think it is a repost and is quite a discovery. I guess the obvious is not always correct, in fact, can be very incorrect.



Re: Heart Death Or Cell Death?

Posted by Ray Tahir [3334.3362] on May 01, 2007 at 21:30:39:

In Reply to: Re: Heart Death Or Cell Death? posted by Sally [8783.1590] on May 01, 2007 at 21:28:10:

This is the kind of thing you wish they would hurry up and do more research. It seems that if this is true, then they are actually doing more harm than good they way they are reacting to heart attack patients. I may be jumping the gun, but I'll take 80% statistics over 16% stastics of recovery anytime!



Re: Heart Death Or Cell Death?

Posted by Sally [8783.1590] on May 01, 2007 at 21:40:39:

In Reply to: Re: Heart Death Or Cell Death? posted by Ray Tahir [3334.3362] on May 01, 2007 at 21:30:39:

Hi Ray, of course they all seem like good ideas at the time. Personally, I'm sick of false findings but once in a while they do come up with something so maybe in five or ten years.........



Re: Heart Death Or Cell Death?

Posted by Wilde [3122.1351] on May 01, 2007 at 21:50:34:

In Reply to: Heart Death Or Cell Death? posted by Ray Tahir [3334.3362] on May 01, 2007 at 18:41:00:

Wow, the author of this article must have died after a heart attack and wasn't brought back to life, because it's dated in the future: May 7, 2007... :)

I'd say he knows what he's talking about

Follow Ups:


Re: Heart Death Or Cell Death?

Posted by Ray Tahir [3334.3362] on May 01, 2007 at 21:55:42:

In Reply to: Re: Heart Death Or Cell Death? posted by Sally [8783.1590] on May 01, 2007 at 21:40:39:

Yeah I know what you mean. One minute Vitamin E helps your heart, the next minute it gives heart attacks. Constant flip flopping of ideas.

Follow Ups:


Re: Heart Death Or Cell Death?

Posted by Carol B. [5488.3312] on May 01, 2007 at 23:13:03:

In Reply to: Heart Death Or Cell Death? posted by Ray Tahir [3334.3362] on May 01, 2007 at 18:41:00:

This article is on page 56 of this week's Newsweek magazine.
Although the magazine was issued on April 30, it is dated May 7, one week later. I've never figured out why they do it that way.

So THAT is why the date looks wrong.
Carol



Follow Ups:


Re: Heart Death Or Cell Death? Archive.

Posted by Walt Stoll [93.1889] on May 02, 2007 at 15:04:27:

In Reply to: Heart Death Or Cell Death? posted by Ray Tahir [3334.3362] on May 01, 2007 at 18:41:00:

Thanks, Ray.

This new concept seems to be not only correct but revolutionary. Everyone should try to understand this.

Walt

Follow Ups:


[ Cardiac Conditions Archive ]
[ Main Archives Page ] [ Glossary/Index ]
[ FAQ ] [ Recommended Books ] [ Bulletin Board ]
   Search this site!