|
[ Essential Fatty Acids Archive ] [ Main Archives Page ] [ Glossary/Index ] [ FAQ ] [ Recommended Books ] [ Bulletin Board ] |
Search this site! | |
so they are going to be listed on packages because they are
bad for us. Didn't they used to be better than saturated
fats ? Glad I didn't switch and went by taste.
VF
In Reply to: Trans fats posted by Vince F on July 13, 2002 at 08:26:28:
Where did you hear that they'll be listed?
In Reply to: Trans fats posted by Vince F on July 13, 2002 at 08:26:28:
Saturated fats are healthy! Trans fats are deadly!
-HY
In Reply to: Re: Trans fats posted by R. on July 13, 2002 at 19:00:03:
FDA to Require Trans Fat Labeling
Thu Jul 11, 2:20 AM ET
By RANDOLPH E. SCHMID, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - Americans trying to avoid artery-clogging trans fat could find it listed on food labels by next year.
Christine Lewis Taylor, labeling chief of the Food and Drug Administration ( news - web sites), said Wednesday a final rule requiring that the amount of trans fat be listed could be completed by this fall or early next spring.
Her announcement followed the release of a report from the Institute of Medicine ( news - web sites) concluding that there is no safe level of trans fat in the diet and urging people to reduce its consumption as much as possible.
That report "really underscores the relationship between intake of trans fat and increased risk of heart disease," Taylor said. "Therefore, providing some kind of information on the label is important for consumers."
Walter C. Willett of Harvard University, who has been active in the study of fats in the diet, called the IOM report "right on target" and welcomed the FDA's decision to act quickly.
"The sad fact is many people trying to make healthy food choices are often unwittingly eating foods that are high in trans fat because it's not on the label, and some food manufacturers have replaced saturated fat with trans fat to try and make their foods look healthier," Willett said.
Because it is directly associated with the bad LDL cholesterol and heart disease, the only safe amount of trans fat in the diet is none, the Institute of Medicine, a branch of the National Academy of Sciences ( news - web sites), said.
But since trans fat occurs in meat, dairy products, pastries and many other foods, eliminating it altogether would mean such extraordinary changes in diet for many people that they might not get enough protein or nutrients, the Institute added.
Since it considers no amount safe, the Institute declined to list an upper limit for trans fat in the diet.
It's that limit that FDA uses to establish the recommended daily value for any part of the diet. That means the FDA will require food producers to list the grams of trans fat on the label with other nutrition facts, but it will not include the percent of daily value, Taylor explained.
The FDA began working on ways to include trans fat on labels in 1999. Last year John D. Graham, the regulatory chief at the Office of Management and Budget, urged the agency to act quickly.
The private Center for Science in the Public Interest has been pressing for inclusion of trans fat on labels since 1994.
"This is the first attempt by a panel of experts to set a safe intake for trans fat ... what's surprising is they concluded the only safe intake of trans fat is zero," said Margo Wootan, director of nutrition policy at CSPI.
She suggested a combined listing of trans fat and saturated fat with a combined daily upper limit. Both types of fat have been shown to contribute to heart disease.
Taylor agreed there are many reasons to be worried about both those fats in the diet, but said they won't be combined on the labels. There will be a separate line for trans fat.
Rather that trying to recommend a limit on consumption of trans fat, the IOM report said it should be "as low as possible while consuming a nutritionally adequate diet."
The FDA has previously estimated that listing trans fat on food labels would save between 2,000 and 5,600 lives a year as people either chose healthier foods or manufacturers improve their recipes to leave out this fat.
Currently the only way to determine if a food contains trans fat is to look for "hydrogenated" on the ingredient list. The most common source of trans fat is partially hydrogenated vegetable oil, in which liquid oil is turned into a solid. This material is included in thousands of foods. Typically, the harder a margarine or cooking fat, the more trans fat it includes.
The National Academy of Sciences is an independent organization chartered by Congress to advise the government on scientific matters.
___
In Reply to: FDA to Require Trans Fat Labeling posted by Pam on July 13, 2002 at 21:54:49:
In Reply to: Re: Trans fats posted by R. on July 13, 2002 at 19:00:03:
It is a blessing that they will be on a separate line and not lumped with saturated fats!!!!!!!!
In Reply to: Re: Trans fats posted by jgv on July 13, 2002 at 22:45:27:
Only if people learn that they are to be avoided. And that will lead to healthier people who live longer => higher housing prices, more old people, higher taxes, world overpopulation, lack of oxygen, suffocation, death. I don't think this is such a good idea. They should add lethal doses of poisons in junk food and stop HB1 visa program so that the job market improves.
In Reply to: FDA to Require Trans Fat Labeling posted by Pam on July 13, 2002 at 21:54:49:
Thanks, Pam.
Namaste`
Walt
|
[ Essential Fatty Acids Archive ] [ Main Archives Page ] [ Glossary/Index ] [ FAQ ] [ Recommended Books ] [ Bulletin Board ] |
Search this site! | |