Veterinarian Holistic Medicine Archives

Chalk one up to Holistic Vets. (Archive.)

Comments?

Comments?
Misty
http://www.searching-alternatives.com

Bill targets excess vaccination of pets
By Valerie Richardson
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

http://washingtontimes.com/national/20030219-29360359.htm

DENVER - The last time Jim Schwartz took his beloved poodle Moolah to
the veterinarian, she was 11 years old and in poor health.

Even so, the veterinarian insisted that Moolah receive a one-year
rabies vaccine. Within days, the black standard poodle was dead - the
victim, Mr. Schwartz says, of a vaccination that she didn't need and,
as he discovered later, that wasn't mandated by law.

His dog's death transformed Mr. Schwartz from retired financial
planner to tireless opponent of animal overvaccination. After three
years of advocacy, his crusade culminated this year in a Colorado
bill that would reclassify pets as "companions," limit vaccinations,
and make it possible for their owners to sue for up to $100,000 for
loss of companionship.

The current law classifies animals as property and allows owners to
seek only the "fair market value" of their pets, even in the case of
veterinary malpractice.

"People don't think of their dogs and cats as just property. They
make pets their beneficiaries in their wills," said Mr. Schwartz, who
founded the Next-to-Kin Foundation to promote animal welfare. "You
can't make your color TV a beneficiary."

The landmark legislation has since become the center of attention,
but it's not the kind Mr. Schwartz was hoping for. The idea of
designating animals as "companions" became the focus of national and
international joke fodder, appearing in reports on BBC-TV and even
landing a spot last week in the monologue on "The Tonight Show with
Jay Leno."

The Colorado Veterinary Medical Association and the American Humane
Society came out against the bill, arguing that it would result in
more lawsuits against vets and, therefore, increase the cost of
animal health care.

Homosexual activists held signs at the state Capitol protesting that
if the bill passed, animals would have more rights than they do.
Republican Gov. Bill Owens said that he wasn't sure what he thought
of the bill, but that his dog Hannah was in favor of it.

As a result, the legislation's nine lives are nearly spent. Its
sponsor, Republican state Rep. Mark Cloer, pulled the bill Friday
after the committee refused to hear testimony on it. The legislation
is not likely to be revived, said state Senate Majority Leader John
Andrews.

"With all the uproar - the international attention, the jokes on Jay
Leno - I think the wisest thing is to wait until next year," Mr.
Andrews said. "There's too much of a circus this year. With
everything else we have to do, I don't want to revive this bill."

Despite the Colorado setback, Mr. Schwartz says his drive to curb pet
vaccinations is gaining steam.

At the heart of the issue is how often pets need to be vaccinated,
particularly against rabies. In Colorado and 33 other states, the law
permits the usage of the recently developed three-year rabies
vaccine, but most veterinarians aren't telling pet owners about this,
according to a 2000 survey in Vet Trends magazine.

As a result, most owners opt for the one-year vaccine, which can
result in pets receiving too much of the medication and putting them
at risk for complications, Mr. Schwartz said.

That, he says, is what happened to his dog. His veterinarian told him
that the law mandated an annual fidyl rabies shot, he said, even
though the three-year option became law in July 1999 and the vaccine
label stated that the drug was to be given only to healthy dogs.

He contends that veterinarians prefer the annual shot because
vaccinations make up 10 to 15 percent of their business. "A vaccine
costs 60 cents to the vets, but they charge $25 to $38 for the office
visit," Mr. Schwartz said. "Follow the money."

The Colorado Veterinary Medical Association denies that its members
are trying to profit by overvaccinating pets.

Critics also said the Colorado proposal would result in a bonanza for
tort lawyers, which ultimately led Republican lawmakers to put the
legislation in the doghouse.

"What they don't understand is that this isn't a liberal boo-hoo
issue," said Mr. Schwartz, a Republican. "This was a responsible bill
that tries to cut lawyers out of the process. This is a Republican
issue of personal responsibility."

Re: Chalk one up to Holistic Vets. (Archive.)